The Converse Chuck Taylor is one of the most influential sneakers of all time. Since the 1970s, these high-top sneakers have raced from basket to basket across multiple basketball courts, later becoming the staple in everyone's closet.
However, as the classic sneaker evolved, Converse finally looked back, where they introduced the Chuck 70 in 2013.
The All Star Chuck 70 is a redesigned shoe with modern details. It is more of a competitor to the classic Chuck Taylor sneakers of the late 1960s and 1970s. The shoes have a slightly higher rubber sole, a cushioned insole and a sturdy rubber toe cap for long-lasting comfort.
These shoes have a chunkier look with a higher sidewall and a sculpted silhouette. They also look aged with yellowed rubber, reminiscent of a classic vintage sneaker.
The Chuck 70s are packed with more cushioning than the Classics. So if you want more support, they might be a better choice for you. In addition, the higher rubber sidewall is not just for looks. Gives the shoe more stability.
The beautiful looks are paired with updated components to solidify the Chuck 70s as the must-have shoe for the brand. In fact, Convers has collaborated with a bevy of popular designers and celebrities including Dover Street Market, JW Anderson, Carhartt WIP and Brain Dead.
Besides the aesthetics, what else is different? Is the $30 price worth it? Or what is even the best version?
Chuck 70 Vs All Star: What's The Difference?
what's new the outside ofsneakers, which comes in black, blue or red, not much has changed. The screen on the top, as used on the Chuck 70, is labeled "Premium" in printed fabric, although it's haptically indistinguishable from the standard screen.
In addition, there are the matt, single-colored eyelets, which give the shoes a slightly slimmed-down look. The white rubber sidewall, or rather the foxing where the canvas upper meets the sole, is a bit thicker on the Chuck 70. The All Star logo patch on the inside of the heel (high top) is embroidered instead of printed.
The most notable difference to the Chuck Taylor Star, however, comes from the hood with additional cushioning lime green lining made from a proprietary Nike foam called Lunarlon.
There are also some other internal customizations, such as: B. perforatedMicro Suede Leather Paddingto increase breathability and foam padding on the collar and tongue for maximum comfort.
Note that that foot-shaped foam sheet, which the manufacturer says was added to improve cushioning and arch support, is the biggest differentiator.
Furthermore, in the course of our analysis and research, when we compared the Chuck 70 side-by-side with the All Star II (same color and original low-top version), we found that the biggest surprise was how little the difference between the two models was have seemed. . in shape and feel.
The All Star II's sockliner is a little less flexible - although we can tolerate that given the thickness of the sockliner inserts. Every step of the new Chuck 70 is designed to feel a little more cushioned than the original. However, first impressions aren't really what justify the $20 price tag.
The shoes are a bit more comfortable and you notice that after a day of wearing them. Your feet will end up looking as good as if you put your shoes on in the morning. However, the originals can cause arch and ankle pain - especially if you have flat feet or are overweight.
Many users reported that their feet were shod in the new Chuck 70. The experience is so comparable to wearing a pair of running shoes with foot cushioning that has arch support. You'll notice an improvement after spending a day in a pair of Original All Stars.
Sometimes Chuck Taylor All Star shoes have transcended the fact that they were just a piece of athletic footwear to become a fashion statement. Today the shoes are worn at weddings and even on stage at shows by famous models such as the Ramones, Kurt Cobain, Cate Blanchett and Michelle Obama.
Chuck Taylor sneakers were the first to be worn beyond aesthetic aspirations - which is easy to overlook given the rise of sneaker culture in the early 1980s.
Basically, with the redesigned Chuck Taylor All Star II, Converse offers a version of your favorite all-purpose sneaker that looks a little different on the outside. The Chuck 70 looks very different from the inside, which probably helps with the target audience. But is this remastered model of the original All Star for everyone?
Well, for cuck lovers who think they're a little older or weigh a little more than when they bought their All Stars, or those who plan on spending a lot of time on their feet, the Chuck 70 is worth a look.
Other notable differences
Material: All Star upper has a soft feel and is as light as a New York bag. With the Chuck 70s, on the other hand, the fabric draws the most attention even before you put on the sneakers. Weighing 12 ounces, the cotton canvas is chunkier and a little firmer. You also get an extra layer of canvas sewn over the top on both sides of the vamp.
Insoles refer to the cushioning included in a pair of Chuck Taylors. Well, the original All Stars' filling level is just enough to easily get you through the day. But you really can't count them as an orthopedic oasis.
With the Chuck 70, the insoles feel more resilient and spongy compared to the Classic Chunk. This is particularly the case on the balls of the feet.
While both soles look very similar, the Chunk 70 appears to have a bit more grip, despite having less pronounced grooves than the classic All Stars. The sole material of the All Stars is flexible, but not thin. The same aspect is clear, even more so with the Chuck 70s.
In this light (on the All Stars) the needles in the laces and the ventilation system are silver and matte. That is, they look identical to the alternative. With the Chuck 70, the metal eyelets are designed to match the rubber. That means the eyelets are also part of the style, as they're glossy, as opposed to the matte finish on the original All Stars.
The Classic All Star's laces are true white to match the matte white rubber on the sole and toe cap. For the Chuck 70, it's no surprise that the laces feel like an upgrade. The entire lacing system is thicker and tighter.
Another great appeal of the Chuck 70 is its silhouette. The latest for this great competitor gives the shoe a nice shape and definition.
So which is better: Chuck 70 or Original All Star?
In short, you should consider the Chuck 70 Remake if you're willing to shell out a little more for an enhanced experience. While the Classic Chuck's upper feels like a bag given away for free, the redesigned upper of the Chuck 70 feels more like a bag worth paying for.
That may sound like a highlight and it definitely is. In fact, this is one of the reasons for the higher price. The 70s are packed with more cushioning compared to the classics, meaning the shoes are still an ideal option for you if you want more support. Also, they have a higher rubber sidewall that gives the shoe more stability and elegance.
That said, you might want to go for the Classic All Star if you find its shape more appealing than the Chuck 70 and save $30.
The Classics are also significantly lighter, but the heel counter is relatively stiffer than the Chuck 70s. This, in turn, helps keep the shoes in pristine condition over time. The glossy lacquer on the Chuck 70's rubber gives off a vintage feel, but isn't particularly appealing to those who prefer a worn shoe.
The matte look of the original All Star eyelets and rubber trumps that of the '70s. Aesthetically, the Chuck 70s has vintage appeal with a more distinctive profile, cream rubber toe cap and foxing patches.